合作客戶/
拜耳公司 |
同濟(jì)大學(xué) |
聯(lián)合大學(xué) |
美國(guó)保潔 |
美國(guó)強(qiáng)生 |
瑞士羅氏 |
相關(guān)新聞Info
-
> 不同有機(jī)溶劑對(duì)離子液體密度、表面張力和導(dǎo)熱系數(shù)的影響
> 有關(guān)表面張力儀產(chǎn)品優(yōu)點(diǎn)和參數(shù)說(shuō)明
> 海藻糖脂:一種兼具優(yōu)異發(fā)泡性能與皮膚溫和性的新型表面活性劑(三)
> 表面張力儀應(yīng)用案例:芳綸纖維復(fù)合材料浸潤(rùn)性測(cè)量原理與步驟
> 氣體富集、雜質(zhì)對(duì)固-液界面納米氣泡接觸角的影響——引言、實(shí)驗(yàn)儀器與試劑
> 接觸角遲滯時(shí)氣~液界面張力的溫度敏感性對(duì)液滴蒸發(fā)過(guò)程的影響——引言
> 生物表面活性劑產(chǎn)生菌的篩選及對(duì)PAHs污染環(huán)境的修復(fù)效果研究(一)
> 腰果酚醛樹脂嵌段聚醚破乳劑表面/界面性能、油滴破裂速率常數(shù)測(cè)定(二)
> 雙締合型穩(wěn)泡劑及其制備方法和應(yīng)用
> 新型納米材料2-D納米黑卡在油水界面的微觀驅(qū)油機(jī)理、界面張力測(cè)定(三)
推薦新聞Info
-
> 短碳氟鏈陽(yáng)離子氟表面活性劑PFB-MC的界面張力及復(fù)配協(xié)同效應(yīng)研究
> 短碳氟鏈陽(yáng)離子氟表面活性劑PFB-MC的油/水界面張力及復(fù)配性能
> 體系pH值調(diào)控:提升泡沫滅火劑長(zhǎng)期儲(chǔ)存穩(wěn)定性的關(guān)鍵策略
> 液相色譜-質(zhì)譜聯(lián)用揭秘:誰(shuí)在泡沫滅火劑熱老化中降解了?
> 表面張力不變、發(fā)泡倍率下降——泡沫滅火劑熱老化中的反常信號(hào)
> ?有機(jī)硅疏水材料路基隔水層隔水性能評(píng)價(jià)方法
> ?中厚板焊接接頭可控導(dǎo)流界面構(gòu)筑方法及裝置
> 頁(yè)巖油儲(chǔ)層超臨界CO?-表面活性劑復(fù)合吞吐實(shí)驗(yàn)與效果評(píng)價(jià)
> 利用界面張力儀優(yōu)選頁(yè)巖油超臨界CO?吞吐用高效氣溶性表面活性劑
> 界面張力如何改變兩層液體的臨界對(duì)流行為
Delta-8 動(dòng)物胃腸道體內(nèi)中藥物的溶解度的測(cè)定——結(jié)論、工具書類!
來(lái)源:上海謂載 瀏覽 2260 次 發(fā)布時(shí)間:2021-11-26
結(jié)論
胃腸道pH值和緩沖容量的種間差異是重要的考慮因素,尤其是對(duì)胃腸道給藥的pHresponsive配方和可電離藥物。 因此,兔子和豬的空腸、回腸和近端結(jié)腸具有相對(duì)較高的緩沖容量,而豬遠(yuǎn)端結(jié)腸具有較低的緩沖容量是非常重要的考慮因素。 與人相比,大鼠、兔和豬的近端小腸和升結(jié)腸的液體的滲透壓和表面張力也較高。 胃腸道特征的這些差異導(dǎo)致潑尼松龍?jiān)诖笫篌w內(nèi)的溶解度較高(近端結(jié)腸除外),而潑尼松龍?jiān)谪i和兔體內(nèi)的溶解度與人類相當(dāng)。 因此,如果在大鼠的體液中測(cè)量,中性化合物潑尼松龍的溶解度可能被高估。 另一方面,可電離藥物美沙拉秦在兔和豬體內(nèi)的溶解度在小腸中部高于人,在結(jié)腸中低于人,僅在小腸遠(yuǎn)端與人相當(dāng)。 胃腸道環(huán)境的差異,如pH值、緩沖容量、滲透壓和表面張力,導(dǎo)致藥物溶解度的差異。 在兔子和豬中,美沙拉秦的溶解度在沿胃腸道向下移動(dòng)時(shí)發(fā)生顯著變化,這在很大程度上受管腔液的pH值和滲透壓的影響。
工具書類
1. Flaisher-Grinberg S et al. Models of mania: from facets to domains and from animal models to model animals. J Psychopharmacol 2010; 24: 437–438.
2. Insel TR. From animal models to model animals. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 62: 1337–1339.
3. Hannah-Poquette C et al. Modeling mania: further validation for Black Swiss mice as model animals. Behav Brain Res 2011; 223: 222–226.
4. Calabrese EJ. Gastrointestinal and dermal absorption – interspecies differences. Drug Metab Rev 1984; 15: 1013–1032.
5. Kararli TT. Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory-animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1995; 16: 351–380.
6. McConnell EL et al. Measurements of rat and mouse gastrointestinal pH, fluid and lymphoid tissue, and implications for in-vivo experiments. J Pharm Pharmacol 2008; 60: 63–70.
7. Ward FW, Coates ME. Gastrointestinal pH measurement in rats: influence of the microbial flora, diet and fasting. Lab Anim 1987; 21: 216–222.
8. Smith HW. Observations on the Flora of the alimentary tract of animals and factors affecting its composition. J Pathol Bacteriol 1965; 89: 95–122.
9. Clarysse S et al. Postprandial evolution in composition and characteristics of human duodenal fluids in different nutritional states. J Pharm Sci 2009; 98: 1177–1192.
10. Kalantzi L et al. Characterization of the human upper gastrointestinal contents under conditions simulating bioavailability/bioequivalence studies. Pharm Res 2006; 23: 165–176.
11. Fadda HM et al. Drug solubility in luminal fluids from different regions of the small and large intestine of humans. Mol Pharm 2010; 7: 1527– 1532.
12. Merchant HA et al. Assessment of gastrointestinal pH, fluid and lymphoid tissue in the guinea pig, rabbit and pig, and implications for their use in drug development. Eur J Pharm Sci 2011; 42: 3–10.
13. ToxNet. Mesalamine: Toxicology data network (ToxNet). US National Library of Medicine, CASRN: 89-57-6. 2014. (http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/ search2/r?dbs+hsdb:@term+@rn+@ rel+89-57-6, last accessed 25th June 2014).
14. Machatha SG, Yalkowsky SH. Comparison of the octanol/water partition coefficients calculated by ClogP, ACDlogP and KowWin to experimentally determined values. Int J Pharm 2005; 294: 185–192.
15. McConnell EL et al. Gut instincts: explorations in intestinal physiology and drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2008; 364: 213–226.
16. Mudie DM et al. Physiological parameters for oral delivery and in vitro testing. Mol Pharm 2010; 7: 1388– 1405.
17. French DL, Mauger JW. Evaluation of the physicochemical properties and dissolution characteristics of mesalamine: relevance to controlled intestinal drug delivery. Pharm Res 1993; 10: 1285–1290.
18. Perez de la Cruz Moreno M et al. Characterization of fasted-state human intestinal fluids collected from duodenum and jejunum. J Pharm Pharmacol 2006; 58: 1079–1089. 19. Diakidou A et al. Characterization of the contents of ascending colon to which drugs are exposed after oral administration to healthy adults. Pharm Res 2009; 26: 2141–2151.
Delta-8 動(dòng)物胃腸道體內(nèi)中藥物的溶解度的測(cè)定——摘要、介紹
Delta-8 動(dòng)物胃腸道體內(nèi)中藥物的溶解度的測(cè)定——材料和方法





