合作客戶/
拜耳公司 |
同濟(jì)大學(xué) |
聯(lián)合大學(xué) |
美國保潔 |
美國強(qiáng)生 |
瑞士羅氏 |
相關(guān)新聞Info
-
> 不同有機(jī)溶劑對離子液體密度、表面張力和導(dǎo)熱系數(shù)的影響
> 有關(guān)表面張力儀產(chǎn)品優(yōu)點(diǎn)和參數(shù)說明
> 海藻糖脂：一種兼具優(yōu)異發(fā)泡性能與皮膚溫和性的新型表面活性劑（三）
> 表面張力儀應(yīng)用案例：芳綸纖維復(fù)合材料浸潤性測量原理與步驟
> 氣體富集、雜質(zhì)對固-液界面納米氣泡接觸角的影響——引言、實(shí)驗(yàn)儀器與試劑
> 接觸角遲滯時氣~液界面張力的溫度敏感性對液滴蒸發(fā)過程的影響——引言
> 生物表面活性劑產(chǎn)生菌的篩選及對PAHs污染環(huán)境的修復(fù)效果研究（一）
> 腰果酚醛樹脂嵌段聚醚破乳劑表面/界面性能、油滴破裂速率常數(shù)測定（二）
> 雙締合型穩(wěn)泡劑及其制備方法和應(yīng)用
> 新型納米材料2-D納米黑卡在油水界面的微觀驅(qū)油機(jī)理、界面張力測定（三）
推薦新聞Info
-
> 短碳氟鏈陽離子氟表面活性劑PFB-MC的界面張力及復(fù)配協(xié)同效應(yīng)研究
> 短碳氟鏈陽離子氟表面活性劑PFB-MC的油/水界面張力及復(fù)配性能
> 體系pH值調(diào)控：提升泡沫滅火劑長期儲存穩(wěn)定性的關(guān)鍵策略
> 液相色譜-質(zhì)譜聯(lián)用揭秘：誰在泡沫滅火劑熱老化中降解了？
> 表面張力不變、發(fā)泡倍率下降——泡沫滅火劑熱老化中的反常信號
> ?有機(jī)硅疏水材料路基隔水層隔水性能評價方法
> ?中厚板焊接接頭可控導(dǎo)流界面構(gòu)筑方法及裝置
> 頁巖油儲層超臨界CO?-表面活性劑復(fù)合吞吐實(shí)驗(yàn)與效果評價
> 利用界面張力儀優(yōu)選頁巖油超臨界CO?吞吐用高效氣溶性表面活性劑
> 界面張力如何改變兩層液體的臨界對流行為
表面活性劑是否對斥水性土壤的潤濕性有影響？——結(jié)論、致謝！
來源：上海謂載 瀏覽 2236 次 發(fā)布時間:2021-11-09
結(jié)論
不像人工創(chuàng)造的穩(wěn)定的驅(qū)蟲表面或多孔 介質(zhì)，拒水土壤表現(xiàn)出潤濕動力學(xué)，由此 最初疏水的土壤隨著時間的推移變得親水 與水接觸時。 初始潤濕動力學(xué) 排斥土壤通常歸因于 固液界面能 (γSL)，或液汽界面能 (γLV) 的降低，或兩者兼而有之。 γLV 的減少 建議是由于土壤表面溶解 活性有機(jī)化合物進(jìn)入與水接觸的水中 土壤。 在這項(xiàng)研究中，我們測試了土傳表面的影響 潤濕動力學(xué)的活性物質(zhì)，并發(fā)現(xiàn)，與廣為接受的范式相反，土壤釋放表面 活性化合物不會加速潤濕過程。 因此很明顯，固體界面能的變化 表面（γSL 或 γSV），而不是液汽 表面 (γLV) 必須在驅(qū)動不穩(wěn)定排斥性土壤的潤濕動力學(xué)方面起主導(dǎo)作用。
致謝
本研究由以色列農(nóng)業(yè)部資助 和農(nóng)村發(fā)展，資助號 821-0088-04。
參考
Barrett, G. & Slaymaker, O. 1989. Identification, characterization, and hydrological implications of water repellency in mountain soils, southern British-Columbia. Catena, 16, 477–489.
Bisdom, E.B.A., Dekker, L.W. & Schoute, J.F.T. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma, 56, 105–118.
Chen, Y. & Schnitzer, M. 1978. Surface-tension of aqueous-solutions of soil humic substances. Soil Science, 125, 7–15.
Dekker, L.W., Oostindie, K. & Ritsema, C.J. 2005. Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43, 403–441.
Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E.R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T. et al. 2006. Cloud condensation nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 2465–2481.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A. & Walsh, R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51, 33–65.
Doerr, S.H., Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., Shakesby, R.A. & Bryant, R. 2002. Water repellency of soils: the influence of ambient relative humidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 401–405.
Ellerbrock, R.H., Gerke, H.H., Bachmann, J. & Goebel, M.O. 2005. Composition of organic matter fractions for explaining wettability of three forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 57–66.
Feng, G.L., Letey, J. & Wu, L. 2002. The influence of two surfactants on infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 361–367.
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Monograph No 9 (ed. A. Klute), pp. 383–411.
American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Graber, E.R., Ben-Arie, O. & Wallach, R. 2006. Effect of sample disturbance on soil water repellency determination in sandy soils. Geoderma, 136, 11–19.
Hurrass, J. & Schaumann, G.E. 2006. Properties of soil organic matter and aqueous extracts of actually water repellent and wettable soil samples. Geoderma, 132, 222–239.
Letey, J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Repellent Soils 6–8 May 1968 (eds L.F. DeBano & J.F. Letey), pp. 43–47. University of California, Riverside, CA. Letey, J., Carrillo, M.L.K. & Pang, X.P. 2000. Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 61–65.
Ma'shum, M. & Farmer, V.C. 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy South Australian soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 623–626.
Roy, J.L. & McGill, W.B. 2002. Assessing soil water repellency using the molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) test. Soil Science, 167, 83–97.
Tschapek, M. 1984. Criteria for determining the hydrophilicityhydrophobicity of soils. Zeitschrift fu¨r Pflanzenerna¨hrung und Bodenkunde, 147, 137–149.
Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifi- cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38. Wallach, R. & Graber, E.R. 2007. Effluent irrigation-induced soil water repellency: time dependent variation of infiltration rate and of water repellency at different levels of ambient relative humidity. Hydrological Processes, 21, 2346–2355.
Wallach, R., Ben-Arie, O. & Graber, E.R. 2005. Soil water repellency induced by long-term irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 1910–1920.
Wallis, M.G. & Horne, D.J. 1992. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science, 20, 91–140.